You have arrived at the web home of Noah Brier. This is mostly an archive of over a decade of blogging and other writing. You can read more about me or get in touch. If you want more recent writing of mine, most of that is at my BrXnd marketing x AI newsletter and Why Is This Interesting?, a daily email for the intellectually omnivorous.
I've got a couple big ideas floating around in my head that I'd like to write more about, but I'm not quite sure how to form any of them into full entries. So I figured I'd just throw them out there and see what sticks.
You know those people who are always saying "I have a theory that . . ."? Well my friend Shana has a theory that those are the most interesting people. When you have theories about things you are showing that your observant and that you make connections between seemingly disconnected things. I also think you're exposing a lot about yourself and how you view the world. (By the way, Shana requested that link herself.)
Credit on this one goes to Martin. We had a long conversation about the idea that brands only exist in the mind of the beholder. It's kind of like color: Two people see green in completely different ways. Or, to take it a step further (courtesy of Noah), there is no color unless there is light. In the dark color ceases to exist. You can put your product out there and do your best to control a person's experience, but the brand belongs to them. It's not so easy to comprehend, but as Martin wrote in Adweek, "What I realized is that this idea [that all products are brands] may have been true in the past, when product, brand and need (or, said another way, 'the consumer') were all neatly aligned. But it's not true now. Now they are three distinct entities. And as such, each requires its own champion."
I wrote this in May: "Desire lines are the unpaved paths that people wear down over time. In a way, does that represent collective intelligence? What about the "ask the audience" feature on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Yeah, it's post internet, but the idea is not revolutionary. When people can contribute to the group anonymously, without worry of social repercussions, honest answers will emerge. When aggregated, those honest answers will represent collective intelligence." I first read about it in an Adaptive Path article titled "Metadata for the Masses". It's one of those ideas that pops up all the time, but I'm just not quite sure how to apply it. Go any good ideas?
Really, all these different services we use (del.icio.us, last.fm and even Netflix) are blogging platforms in one way or another. The way I see it is if you're sharing information about what you're paying attention to you're 'blogging.' That can be what movies you're watching or what links you've read lately. This isn't a new idea or anything, but I've been thinking about it more now that Netflix offers a mass example to us (the friend feature exposes your queue to people).
Well, that's it for now. Any thoughts on any of these ideas would be greatly appreciated. If there's any one in particular you'd like to read more about I can write a full post on them in the future.
